Lexmark's complaint also alleges traditional copyright infringement, saying the Smartek chips contain "unauthorized, identical copies of Lexmark's copyrighted Toner Loading Programs." ...

Lexmark, however, doesn’t want that; if you use third-party toner cartridges, that’s money that Lexmark doesn’t make. So it sued, which brings us to the legal chain that ended up at the ...

Lexmark is now a publicly-traded company (NYSE: LXK) with more than 12,000 employees and $3.7 billion in annual revenue.

Impression Products vs. Lexmark International hinged on two points: Did Impression infringe upon Lexmark's patents by (1) reselling cartridges in the United States when Lexmark explicitly ...

On Tuesday, a scary case reached a surprisingly positive outcome in the Supreme Court of the United States. Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. was seven-year-long standoff ...

Tips In 2002, Lexmark sued a third-party ink cartridge company to prevent the firm from selling reset and recycled toner cartridges to consumers.

Does Lexmark's patent on ink cartridges extend to forbidding buyers from re-using or selling them? No way, says a nearly unanimous Supreme Court.